Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 08:24:50 -0700 From: "Atom Powers" <atom.powers@gmail.com> To: "Tyrone.VanDerHaar@telecityredbus.se" <Tyrone.VanDerHaar@telecityredbus.se> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: route malfunction wrong info Message-ID: <df9ac37c0606040824t19ea4819mcc805cdde5d7fa7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <D3BBF0C6F2FC0448BFCA2F965F219263030744@sto1.tcy.prv> References: <D3BBF0C6F2FC0448BFCA2F965F2192631DEBC9@sto1.tcy.prv> <D3BBF0C6F2FC0448BFCA2F965F219263030744@sto1.tcy.prv>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/4/06, Tyrone.VanDerHaar@telecityredbus.se <Tyrone.VanDerHaar@telecityredbus.se> wrote: > Hi, > I'm running Freebsd 6.1RC-1. > > Can anyone tell me if this is a bug or not? > -Vlan137 is up > -I issue a route get subnet from valn137 and I see the route exists > -I issue an ifconfig vlan137 down > -I then issue route get (subnet on the downed interface) and is show it as up > Shouldn't this route dissapear when I issue the ifconfig vlan137 down? I don't think so, assuming you are using static routes. Even if an interface is down, the system is still attached to that network even though it won't use it; so that is still a valid route even if it can't be used. If you "destroy"-ed that interface I bet the route would dissipear. Or you could use a dynamic routing protocol. -- -- Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard. --Atom Powers--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?df9ac37c0606040824t19ea4819mcc805cdde5d7fa7>