From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Sep 20 15:33:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96AECA05DB1 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 15:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefan.wendler@tngtech.com) Received: from zimbra.tngtech.com (zimbra.tngtech.com [212.204.93.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48A751C8A; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 15:33:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefan.wendler@tngtech.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.tngtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A45B0024B; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 17:33:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zimbra.tngtech.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.tngtech.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id AliOCShlnQ63; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 17:33:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.tngtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BBAB004EF; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 17:33:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tngtech.com Received: from zimbra.tngtech.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.tngtech.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id E36fJiisgINR; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 17:33:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hactar.localnet (p4FE56636.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.229.102.54]) by zimbra.tngtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 244BAB0024B; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 17:33:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Stefan Wendler To: Slawa Olhovchenkov Cc: Adrian Chadd , Michael Gmelin , freebsd-current Subject: Re: Intel Haswell support - Any updates? Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 17:33:46 +0200 Message-ID: <1968130.BUA7geK8Eg@hactar> Organization: TNG Technology Consulting GmbH User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.2-RELEASE; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20150918210548.GV3158@zxy.spb.ru> References: <20150918210548.GV3158@zxy.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 15:33:58 -0000 On Saturday 19 September 2015 00:05:48 Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:50:16PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Just run -HEAD. Outside of occasional hiccups, a whole bunch of us use > > it for day to day work, and it works fine. > > Some years ago -HEAD break may be one at month, now -HEAD break some times > at week, and, may be, persistent break (em/igb, callout, i915 on 945G (yes, > this is also break on -stable, but on stable simple revert two commit > and will be nice, on -head you got many coomits)). > > Development is ipmotant and development w/o breaks imposibles, but > current -HEAD not to agree with genareal user. How far ist -STABLE behind? This could be a way to go. But my Notebook is a SPF and I don't have the time to do much more than activating the boot env I created before an upgrade. Cheers