From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Jul 18 6:12:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from axl.ops.uunet.co.za (axl.ops.uunet.co.za [196.31.2.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8461537BDA2 for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 06:12:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.ops.uunet.co.za) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.ops.uunet.co.za) by axl.ops.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.15 #1) id 13EXAX-000CvM-00; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 15:12:17 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Marcel Moolenaar Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Multiple kernels / module search path In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 Jul 2000 22:09:44 MST." <3973E698.B8D53F1F@cup.hp.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 15:12:17 +0200 Message-ID: <49681.963925937@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 17 Jul 2000 22:09:44 MST, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > Question 3: Should we change the order in which modules are searched to > /modules{.NAME}:/boot:/, where {.NAME} denotes the optional name suffix. I really don't think that this is the way to go. A module should be a module should be a module. That's certainly where we're headed, right? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message