Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:52:59 -0500 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [RFC] SysV SHM on 64-bit platforms Message-ID: <20080119145259.GA36194@sandvine.com> In-Reply-To: <20080119122657.GN99258@elvis.mu.org> References: <200801181217.52788.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <20080119122657.GN99258@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 04:26:57AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> [080119 00:05] wrote: > > FYI, fixing ipc_perm is a lot more complicated and very intrusive. > > Why does ipc_perm need fixing? Most of the types in ipc_perm have the wrong type. There's even an XXX comment in ipc.h saying as much. We really need to fix both issues at the same time though. -Ed
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080119145259.GA36194>