From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 10 07:18:20 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB58F16A403
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 10 May 2006 07:18:20 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from net@dino.sk)
Received: from mail.netlab.sk (mail.netlab.sk [213.215.72.51])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E9743D58
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 10 May 2006 07:18:18 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from net@dino.sk)
Received: from work.dino.sk (home.dino.sk [213.215.74.194])
	(AUTH: PLAIN milan@netlab.sk, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA)
	by mail.netlab.sk with esmtp; Wed, 10 May 2006 09:22:55 +0200
	id 00289C12.446194CF.00002A9B
From: Milan Obuch <net@dino.sk>
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:18:10 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
References: <5EB31780BD297F46812C8F495FA08F620438CAE3@electron.jnpr.net>
	<200605091439.26549.net@dino.sk>
	<Pine.LNX.4.62.0605100147320.4232@pop.ict1.everquick.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0605100147320.4232@pop.ict1.everquick.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200605100918.10875.net@dino.sk>
Subject: Re: vrf support in FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 07:18:20 -0000

On Wednesday 10 May 2006 03:49, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
> MO> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:39:25 +0200
> MO> From: Milan Obuch
>
> MO> > JE> how do you want to select which table should be used?
> MO> > Ingress interface.
> MO>
> MO> Sounds reasonable, one important point missing - packets locally
> MO> originated/'destinated'.
> MO> Other than that, fully acceptable.
>
> IMNSHO, I'd rather have a { default | manually-specified } table for
> locally-sourced packets.
>

My point is I need two processes, say apache, running with two different 
routing tables (typically only default route in there, but this does not 
conceptually matters). That's whole point why I was using Marko's vimages 
for. (With more processes, but this does not matter here)

Regards,
Milan

-- 
Please reply to maling list only. I read it regularly.