Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 20:01:52 +0200 From: Sebastian Lederer <lederer@bonn-online.com> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@www.hotjobs.com> Cc: Alex <garbanzo@hooked.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, support@yard.de Subject: Re: Linux vs FreeBSD (performances) Message-ID: <35E05910.29931BA0@bonn-online.com> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980820162453.305G-100000@bright.fx.genx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alfred Perlstein wrote: > urm > > FreeBSD bright.x 3.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT #7: Sun Aug 16 > 22:05:13 EST 1998 > bright@bright.x:/usr/src/sys/compile/bright i386 > > Linux poopie 2.1.76 #8 Sun Jan 18 03:42:15 EST 1998 i686 unknown > > that's the kernels, btw, about your previous post, every linux user i've > talked to says the NFS is userland. you are sure about it being in > kernel? > > Alfred Perlstein - Programmer, HotJobs Inc. - www.hotjobs.com > -- There are operating systems, and then there's BSD. > -- http://www.freebsd.org/ > On a side note: Recent linux kernels have support for in-kernel nfsd/mountd/statd/lockd (with real locking functionality). Don't know if or how well this works, though. -- Sebastian Lederer lederer@bonn-online.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35E05910.29931BA0>