From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 15:14:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF4516A41C; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:14:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22B043D4C; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:14:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mobile.pittgoth.com (ip68-230-189-73.dc.dc.cox.net [68.230.189.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j59FEanR044541 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 9 Jun 2005 11:14:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 11:13:53 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20050609111353.7edab77b@mobile.pittgoth.com> In-Reply-To: <20050609.085953.81089963.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20050609120120.GC73244@dragon.NUXI.org> <200506091257.j59CvVNu043268@grovel.grondar.org> <20050609.085953.81089963.imp@bsdimp.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, markm@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc group master.passwd X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 15:14:44 -0000 On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 08:59:53 -0600 (MDT) "M. Warner Losh" wrote: > In message: <200506091257.j59CvVNu043268@grovel.grondar.org> > Mark Murray writes: > : "David O'Brien" writes: > : > > It's not a FreeBSD convention. If the underscore serves no other > : > > purpose than satisfying an OpenBSD convention, it should go. > : > > : > Agreed. > : > : Also agreed. > > These user names are coded into the programs we're importing. As > such, if we change the names that are used, then we have to change the > code that references them too. For _pflogd, this would mean taking > files off the vendor branches. For _dhcp, it isn't so bad. By why > gratuitously change it? While I like the idea of removing the underscore, I'm worried about the potential havoc that could have on future imports. Would we be creating even more work for those who maintain them just because the underscores are ``not convention?'' -- Tom Rhodes