From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Sep 16 22:31:25 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA17081 for chat-outgoing; Tue, 16 Sep 1997 22:31:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obie.softweyr.ml.org ([199.104.124.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA17072 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 1997 22:31:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from wes@localhost) by obie.softweyr.ml.org (8.7.5/8.6.12) id XAA01585; Tue, 16 Sep 1997 23:34:27 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 23:34:27 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199709170534.XAA01585@obie.softweyr.ml.org> From: Wes Peters To: Greg Lehey CC: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Printer recommendation In-Reply-To: <19970917125249.41361@lemis.com> References: <19970917125249.41361@lemis.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk John Fieber wrote: % Also, after about 6 years, the paper feed mechanism becomes % notably unreliable. Greg Lehey writes: > To be fair, you should note that that was the case 6 years ago. If > the inkjets have improved as much as laser printers have, I don't > think that would have much relevance to a modern printer. I think they've actually improved *more* than laser printers. These new ones out this summer never seem to jam, are quieter than the previous generation, and are now getting much faster. Sigh. So many toys, so few dollars. ;^) -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC http://www.xmission.com/~softweyr softweyr@xmission.com