From owner-freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 3 03:45:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66B910656BF; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 03:45:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weongyo.jeong@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D3C8FC14; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 03:45:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weongyo.jeong@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f6so2934375rvb.43 for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:45:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:date:to:cc :subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:organization :x-operation-sytem; bh=nfMolgdxGkrquhNJkuJ8jeTtL1rg6/UpDtqxWwVs3TY=; b=TWub0zwqsJ5V3LrsUkyEAj+9foXX/wV7woB6uBKaJ3o5fBgNQa3msuYpmeXQ8L0oq6 RIfSOzynoAyCwWS8EMfhRKGXION1eOi8jd4x1rniInub4JtN/lzEbZr6i2eQwBmPFf1E yTw7Rgavg45eV1nIhStqcfmYsCebH1s7Ub8nU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent :organization:x-operation-sytem; b=T3sZn2GGCNBi/YwBMJ6wW/VxMObbZBcoUuFVj3OBjy+TkDQX2xyr6V/CrA8F43/hH6 AjaFiRKQA3l3Q8duUzLHgfneFWoGZWCh17v91dt2txKsNMd0I/pK1s8n7tb0ygT6kdra YCrDhLBRnioll6bFqwfXL/kyjJvKk8oKLKAn8= Received: by 10.141.87.13 with SMTP id p13mr3256890rvl.166.1236051905982; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:45:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from weongyo ([114.111.62.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b39sm7687900rvf.9.2009.03.02.19.45.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:45:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by weongyo (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 3 Mar 2009 12:44:35 +0900 From: Weongyo Jeong Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 12:44:35 +0900 To: Nathan Whitehorn Message-ID: <20090303034435.GB94580@weongyo.cdnetworks.kr> References: <20090228165533.GA1166@narn.knownspace> <20090301142432.GC1166@narn.knownspace> <1235993578.13513.0.camel@horst-tla> <49ABFAC6.1000000@freebsd.org> <20090303000024.GA82725@michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr> <49AC9C72.3030307@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49AC9C72.3030307@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: CDNetworks. X-Operation-Sytem: FreeBSD Cc: FreeBSD PowerPC ML Subject: Re: No mixer with Snapper X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Weongyo Jeong List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 03:45:07 -0000 On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 08:56:50PM -0600, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > >On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 09:27:02AM -0600, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > >>Horst G?nther Burkhardt III wrote: > >>>On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 17:13 +0100, Marco Trillo wrote: > >>>>Hi, > >>>> > >>>>Thanks! The problem is that an property is used, while > >>>>the OFW-I2C code only looks for . > >>>> > >>>>The attached patch -- to apply in /usr/src/sys -- makes the OFW-I2C > >>>>code also look for the property. With the patch, the > >>>>mixer should attach and work fine. > >>>> > >>>>Regards > >>>>Marco > >>>Awesome, so when will we see this in -CURRENT or better yet -STABLE? ;) > >>> > >>>-- Horst. > >>SVN revision 189280. MFC schedule of interesting features in -CURRENT > >>that I had something to do with: > >> > >>- ATA DMA: unless I receive any bug reports, some time in the middle of > >>this week > > > >Hmm, I think there was a couple of issues of ATA DMA on iBook G4. > >marcel@ and weongyo@ also reported instability of ATA DMA, was that > >fixed? AFAIK weongyo@ couldn't even boot kernel. > >See > >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ppc/2008-November/003372.html > >for entire thread. > > I think it was fixed. The G4 iBook that I've acquired since those > reports works flawlessly, and I haven't received any other reports, > positive or negative, since my earlier attempts at fixing those bugs. If > anyone whose machine didn't work before now does, or is still broken, or > even if your machine has always worked fine with the DMA support, I > would very much appreciate an email. Ok. Currently my build kernel date is at Feb 11 that it still doesn't work to boot the kernel without `set hw.ata.atapi_dma=0'. In addition maybe end of Feb I tried to update kernel but it couldn't boot even if I set hw.ata.atapi_dma=0 so I reverted. And sometime I got unknown kernel hang during buildkernel or buildworld that it's ok with if I set hw.ata.ata_dma = 0; normally the keyboard interrupt didn't work after it happened. Today I'll try to update kernel and world again and make sure let you know its result. :-) Thank you for your hard work. regards, Weongyo Jeong