From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug  5 09:15:53 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B81A106566C;
	Fri,  5 Aug 2011 09:15:53 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from borjam@sarenet.es)
Received: from proxypop01.sare.net (proxypop01.sare.net [194.30.0.28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4798FC1A;
	Fri,  5 Aug 2011 09:15:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [172.16.1.55] (izaro.sarenet.es [192.148.167.11])
	by proxypop01.sare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A2E763E8CC;
	Fri,  5 Aug 2011 11:15:54 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es>
In-Reply-To: <201108041420.p74EKCbY098803@freefall.freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 11:15:07 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BBE4C1F9-E6CA-4BB2-A9DC-DBD1873FE9D6@sarenet.es>
References: <201108041420.p74EKCbY098803@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: Martin Matuska <mm@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/157728: [zfs] zfs (v28) incremental receive may leave
	behind temporary clones
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 09:15:53 -0000

	=09
On Aug 4, 2011, at 4:20 PM, Martin Matuska wrote:

> If you remove that code, it will still work the way it should, but =
slower :)
> I still see no problem in not-prefetching hidden datasets.

Yep, the patch seems to work perfectly. I've been trying to trigger the =
issue and no way, seems to be solved.



Borja.