Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 08:46:23 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 276614] graphics/mesa-dri:fix os_same_file_description warning Message-ID: <bug-276614-7141-RjhPQToBnE@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-276614-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-276614-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D276614 --- Comment #12 from Emmanuel Vadot <manu@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Alexey Dokuchaev from comment #10) > Yes, unfortunately, we've seen this attitude being exhibited more than on= ce. :-( > I'm with Ivan here, esp. given that he's one of our long-term desktop use= rs and=20 > the author of patches that make FreeBSD desktop experience smoother, whil= e=20 > support from our staff X11 maintainers is often lacking. Being alone in the x11@ team for the past ~2 years, I think that I done a pretty correct job at maintaining the ports while still continuing to help people with drm-kmod when problems appears so this comment is hurting me a = bit. Also I use FreeBSD as my main desktop for 20 year now so don't think I hate desktop users :) > Turning away people like him would be a big loss to the project. > It is generally bad to dismiss contributors, let alone threatening them w= ith a ban. It is generally good to dismiss contributors with aggressive attitude thou= gh. > Now that being said, can we (all) please get a little more constructive h= ere?=20=20 > I can understand Emmanuel's unrest with having to maintain some ~100-line= patch. Maintaining a patch isn't the problem (even if I want all patches to be upstreamed ideally), the main problem is that this patch wasn't reviewed, wasn't accepted upstream (unlike the use of kcmp(2) which was merge yesterd= ay) and I don't plan to review it. Having kcmp(2) is an improvement, not a bugf= ix (could be wrong, feel free to correct me). > Maybe there's a less intrusive way to not scare users until kcmp(2) becom= es omnipresent? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-276614-7141-RjhPQToBnE>