From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug  1 16:16:14 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3199E37B401; Fri,  1 Aug 2003 16:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3580143F93; Fri,  1 Aug 2003 16:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from interjet.elischer.org ([12.233.125.100])
          by attbi.com (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP
          id <20030801231612015003tc9qe>; Fri, 1 Aug 2003 23:16:12 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1])
	by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA47490;
	Fri, 1 Aug 2003 16:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 16:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To: deischen@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10308011847230.18146-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0308011614550.46065-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: NVidia glx stuff dies in sysarch(I386_SET_LDT, ...)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 23:16:14 -0000


On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote:

> 
> Perhaps we need to rethink the interface and disallow specification
> of any ldt; only allow dynamic.  We would need a different method of
> setting an array of them, though.

I think that for now we can allow anything over 6 because we are not a
BSDI binary.