From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 28 04:31:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809D8C46 for ; Tue, 28 May 2013 04:31:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD4774C for ; Tue, 28 May 2013 04:31:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-231-35.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.231.35]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9062521D; Tue, 28 May 2013 06:31:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r4S4VIs8003019; Tue, 28 May 2013 06:31:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 06:31:18 +0200 From: Polytropon To: J Ronald Subject: Re: slice and partition in FreeBSD 9.1 Message-Id: <20130528063118.d1d58c3a.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <1369714424.25575.YahooMailNeo@web163001.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <1369714424.25575.YahooMailNeo@web163001.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 04:31:19 -0000 On Mon, 27 May 2013 21:13:44 -0700 (PDT), J Ronald wrote: > During the installation of FreeBSD 9.1 using bsdintall, it seems the concept has been changed. > In the "Partition Editor", using GPT, no slice concept, no partition that using a/b/c/d. That is correct. Instead of the MBR-style partition names (like da0s1a or da0a), GPT-style partition names (like da0p1) are being used. As known, they carry a UFS file system. > Is the partition mechanism simplified here? No. It's a _different_ mechanism. MBR: The old system: fdisk, bsdlabel, newfs -> slices & partitions (slices optional: dedicated) GPT: The new system: gpart, newfs -> partitions ("different kind of" compared to MBR, of course) See this comparison: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/disksetup.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/geom-glabel.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/disks-adding.html Still you have the choice to use MBR partitioning if this is a requirement (maybe due to hardware that has problems booting GPT partitioned media? who knows). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...