Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 09:18:22 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r365003 - head/devel/elfsh/files Message-ID: <20140817091822.GA51054@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <53EF9469.3070704@gmx.de> References: <201408151704.s7FH4f4W071527@svn.freebsd.org> <20140816164551.GA86642@FreeBSD.org> <53EF9469.3070704@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 07:27:05PM +0200, olli hauer wrote: > There are 1182 ports with an '_' in the name and I think reading a patch name > patch-mod_foo__main.c is easier to read then > patch-mod_foo_main.c > patch-mod_foo-main.c > patch-mod_foo--main.c > patch-mod_foo+main.c Apparently there *are* people who don't see the ugliness of __! I'm honestly surprized; I was under impession that we're stuck with this __ stupidity only because people do not care. > Sample ports that will get really bad patch names with '-' or '+' or a > single '_'as new path separtor > > o japanese/timidity++-slang > o lang/libstdc++_stldoc > o textproc/libxml++26-reference > o databases/mysql-connector-c++ > o devel/bncsutil-ghost++ You're welcome to join the discussion on phabricator with specific examples. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140817091822.GA51054>