From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 12 20:29:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BF71065670; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:29:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF488FC17; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:29:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5CKSdLa093361; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:28:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n5CKSdkq093360; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:28:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:28:39 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Ed Schouten Message-ID: <20090612202839.GA93343@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <538f43900906120823w388f1c63ic8d0194017faca6d@mail.gmail.com> <20090612165518.GA15530@phenom.cordula.ws> <20090612172740.GA1952@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20090612175206.GA77895@freebsd.org> <20090612180906.GA12679@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20090612193614.GF48776@hoeg.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090612193614.GF48776@hoeg.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Antonio Gonz?lez Castro , Roman Divacky , FreeBSD Current , cpghost Subject: Re: RFC: C version of devd daemon. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:29:09 -0000 On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 09:36:14PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote: > * Steve Kargl wrote: > > The difference is that devd is required for a functioning > > system while neither groff nor libstdc++[1] would be required. > > No, it isn't. Your system just runs fine when you turn off devd. The > biggest disadvantage is probably that your USB mouse won't work when you > plug it in. > which means your system does *not* "run fine" without devd. :-) -- Steve