Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 23:00:13 -0500 From: Brandon Fosdick <bfoz@glue.umd.edu> To: Joe Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why is splash in GENERIC? Message-ID: <3C2E914D.8D155898@glue.umd.edu> References: <3C2D1E15.A0227235@glue.umd.edu> <1009592372.30665.4.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joe Clarke wrote: > > On Fri, 2001-12-28 at 20:36, Brandon Fosdick wrote: > > I noticed the thread a little while ago about shrinking the kernel to > > get it on the release floppies (was that here or on hackers?) and splash > > seems like a good candidate for the chopping block. AFAICT it's not > > required if you don't want a splash screen and the install disks aren't > > set up for a default splash screen. I just tried making a kernel without > > splash and it seems to work fine, in fact I'm writing this email on the > > same machine. Of course, I've only been running this kernel for a few > > minutes so I guess something bad could crop up. Is there any reason its > > included in GENERIC? > > It also is required for console screen savers, I believe. You should > have no problems if you remove it from your kernel conf. However, you > won't be able to display console screen savers. Checkout man 4 splash. I don't have any console screen savers configured so that explains why I haven't noticed any problems. Thanks. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C2E914D.8D155898>