Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:09:10 +0000 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, jgh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX in bsd.sites.mk Message-ID: <CADLo838XMx3jeJFxMP5Ej007Vmi0bX2i%2BhhGv7zzjObfn-08LQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4f15924a.7CUoXdl4yduNUIqM%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20120116201117.GA90568@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <4f15924a.7CUoXdl4yduNUIqM%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17 Jan 2012 08:32, <perryh@pluto.rain.com> wrote: > > Jason Helfman <jgh@freebsd.org> wrote: > > I was looking at update bsd.sites.mk, and found that > > MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX is only used in one port. > > > > Any objection to moving this site-index into x11-themes/bluecurve-themes, > > and removing from bsd.sites.mk? > > > > There is also a referrence to it in bsd.linux-rpm.mk, but not certain how > > this should be handled. This seems to be a legacy site-index. > > This might better be asked on ports@ (Cc'd). > > I would think that Fedora is a sufficiently common distribution > to warrant keeping this setting in a central location, in case > of future need in a non-X port, unless its presence is causing > problems. > I worry about the ethics of 'stealing' Fedora's bandwidth with other people's ports; we should only be using their mirrors if it's explicitly developed by Fedora. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo838XMx3jeJFxMP5Ej007Vmi0bX2i%2BhhGv7zzjObfn-08LQ>