From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 22 12:54:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B902737B482; Thu, 22 May 2003 12:54:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from magic.adaptec.com (magic-mail.adaptec.com [208.236.45.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D791B43F75; Thu, 22 May 2003 12:54:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scott_long@btc.adaptec.com) Received: from redfish.adaptec.com (redfish.adaptec.com [162.62.50.11]) by magic.adaptec.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4MJoYZ08774; Thu, 22 May 2003 12:50:34 -0700 Received: from btc.adaptec.com (hollin.btc.adaptec.com [10.100.253.56]) by redfish.adaptec.com (8.8.8p2+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA13094; Thu, 22 May 2003 12:54:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3ECD2A51.9000600@btc.adaptec.com> Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 13:51:45 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030414 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: re@FreeBSD.org cc: Ruslan Ermilov cc: current@FreeBSD.org cc: Mike Schreckengost Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.1-BETA2 install results X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 19:54:55 -0000 John Baldwin wrote: > On 22-May-2003 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > >>On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 10:01:27AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: >> >>>Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >>> >>>>While it may seem confusing at a glance, it's okay (skrb5). >>>>Example: we don't provide "share" distribution, but we have >>>>"sshare" source distribution. Similarly here, we don't >>>>provide "krb5" distribution any more (it's part of the >>>>"crypto" distribution), but we provide "skrb5" distribution, >>>>in the same location as "scrypto" and "ssecure", in >>>>${CHROOTDIR}/R/ftp/crypto/. >>>> >>> >>>I'd have to say that I'd rather not perpetuate the inconsistency. >>>These kinds of things make the installer more and more obscure. >>> >> >>What I'm trying to say it that source distribution are >>not strictly bound to their binary equivalents. >> >>The sshare source dist partly ends up in the manpages >>and catpages bin dists. >> >> >>>>>Also, have you tested a release with this patch? >>>>> >>>> >>>>Since it only affects sysinstall(8), I just recompiled the >>>>latter, and played with it for a bit on a running system. >>> >>>Great! John's patch looked a little more complete, maybe John >>>can comment on that. >>> >> >>May I have a look at John's patch as well? > > > It's pretty much identical actually except that I didn't touch > the manpage. Oh, and I left DIST_CRYPTO_BIN around rather than > axeing it. As long as it has been tested I'm fine with either one. > I do think we should fix the skrb5 issue. Hmm, actually, having > looked at how the src dists are built (one for each top-level dir > in /usr/src), getting rid of skrb5 would require an ugly hack, so > I guess we should leave it around. > I think that your patch also updated the DIST_CRYPTO_ALL to reflect the removed dist flags. Not a big deal though. Scott