From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Sep 22 16:47:22 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 565F537B401
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 16:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5.mx.nwbl.wi.voyager.net (out5.mx.nwbl.wi.voyager.net [169.207.3.123])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD6D43E75
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 16:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: from pop1.nwbl.wi.voyager.net (pop1.nwbl.wi.voyager.net [169.207.2.115])
	by out5.mx.nwbl.wi.voyager.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F32CFC694B; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 18:47:19 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [10.1.1.6] (d28.as21.nwbl0.wi.voyager.net [169.207.138.156])
	by pop1.nwbl.wi.voyager.net (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g8MNlIU15721;
	Sun, 22 Sep 2002 18:47:19 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 18:51:14 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To: ak03@gte.com
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: -mcpu=pentiumpro still evil?
In-Reply-To: <20020922102940.5b3cfc26.kabaev@bellatlantic.net>
Message-ID: <20020922184757.L4062-100000@patrocles.silby.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Alexander Kabaev wrote:

> On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 23:10:51 -0500 (CDT)
> Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Is anyone else still seeing Sig 11's from GCC when mcpu=pentiumpro is
> > enabled (as it appears to be by default now)?  I get a segfault in the
> > same place every time when compiling a DIAGNOSTIC kernel when I leave
> > it enabled.
> >
> > Just curious if this is just me or not...
> >
> > Mike "Silby" Silbersack
> >
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> >
> Please post an error message and a traceback from GCC if possible. I
> might have the patch for that.
>
> --
> Alexander Kabaev

Ok, I think this is the correct backtrace:

#0  0x0806ccee in cpp_ideq ()
#1  0x0806d31e in _cpp_lex_direct ()
#2  0x0806cfa5 in _cpp_lex_token ()
#3  0x080589e1 in cpp_macro_definition ()
#4  0x08058a69 in cpp_macro_definition ()
#5  0x08058ca7 in _cpp_handle_directive ()
#6  0x0806cfd4 in _cpp_lex_token ()
#7  0x08057dae in cpp_get_token ()
#8  0x08057ed9 in cpp_scan_nooutput ()
#9  0x080483e1 in do_preprocessing ()
#10 0x08048219 in main ()
#11 0x08048131 in _start ()

I'm seeing the segfault in the kernel make depend step, just as someone
else reported.

Mike "Silby" Silbersack


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message