From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat May 18 12:17:49 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA15189
          for ports-outgoing; Sat, 18 May 1996 12:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from main.put.com (root@main.put.com [165.254.191.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA15184
          for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 18 May 1996 12:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from le@localhost) by main.put.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id PAA05632; Sat, 18 May 1996 15:19:55 GMT
Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 15:19:55 +0000 ()
From: Louis Epstein <le@main.put.com>
To: Soren Dayton <csdayton@midway.uchicago.edu>
cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Pine Ports
In-Reply-To: <199605181916.OAA14392@woodlawn.uchicago.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960518151833.5534C-100000@main.put.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



On Sat, 18 May 1996, Soren Dayton wrote:

> > 
> > Any particular reason 3.91 is still the current Pine port?
> > Are the changes in 3.93 insignificant?
> 
> the developers called 3.92 a beta (and told people not to use it) and
> 3.93 has a bug that kills your terminal emulator if you have 24 lines
> (and the developers tell you not to use it) Clever.  I think that I will
> stick with MH.
> 
> Soren

Thanks for the explanation,sounds like a good reason!

Just looking to stay currrent on apps...I wish my Lynx 2.5 make install
worked,but it thinks some files are missing so I use 2.4.2 there...