Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:49:08 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> Cc: Volker <volker@vwsoft.com>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: licensing question APSL Message-ID: <86fxvu1u63.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20080214191737.GA20098@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> (Brooks Davis's message of "Thu\, 14 Feb 2008 13\:17\:37 -0600") References: <47B3E21F.1010202@vwsoft.com> <20080214150200.GB18534@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <47B49023.20204@vwsoft.com> <20080214191737.GA20098@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> writes: > APSL is not generally accepted in the base. It may be acceptable in > certain circumstances, but strong technical justification is generally > required for inclusion. Which brings us to my reaction to the PR, which is "why do we even need this?" Stick it in ports, please. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86fxvu1u63.fsf>