From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 19:53:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE3616A4CE for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 19:53:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2027343D58 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 19:53:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcapote@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z35so1064977rne for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 11:53:40 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QoB7j4QKlN72rfF7xLb+5e2K0PAOulATvSbFjjnzrwGKuP/AL9VDtMVf94Q0DOPMUDVimY/vSf90HxUZI3VytuNyI8UzZwOVgDoz9thueItrY5SiVIbwIbPGdnx0ZG6MMIgdzbV5B7b5zdVwcstWW/DT25tEUXvwqjdfC26s5XM= Received: by 10.38.78.63 with SMTP id a63mr123243rnb; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 11:53:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.104.15 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 11:53:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:53:40 -0500 From: Julio Capote To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: differences between bsd ifconfig and linux ifconfig... X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Julio Capote List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 19:53:41 -0000 I was wondering if anyone knew architecturally and fundamentally why bsd's ifconfig can display active state information regarding the physical medium and why linux ifconfig cant? Not to start any trolling on which is superior, just curious about the difference. - Julio