Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 15:08:06 -0600 From: Ben Schumacher <ben@henshaw.net> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "ifconfig" == "ifconfig -a" Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20000719150237.00c41100@mail.henshaw.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007191626510.236-100000@bagabeedaboo.securi ty.at12.de> References: <20000719140202.H4668@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 04:35 PM 7/19/00 +0200, Paul Herman wrote: >Hmmm... what led to this idea was: people who use "route print" to >print the routing table in "other" OSes need to be informed how to >print the routing table under FreeBSD. If that's really true, some >how I have a feeling they would already know about "netstat -r" (which >AFAIK is pretty much ubiquitous among Unicies.) > >Is it just me, who thinks this? I personally, cast my (mostly meaningless) vote against "route print" or just "route" showing routing tables. To be honest, even on those other OSes, I always type netstat -r to get routing tables (which works on Win9x/NT, as well). Normally when I type just "route" it is to remind my simple mind of the syntax I need to use on the rare occasions that I need to change routing tables. Just my two cents. - Ben Schumacher To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20000719150237.00c41100>