From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jul 9 10:30:54 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from InterJet.elischer.org (c421509-a.pinol1.sfba.home.com [24.7.86.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDA237B403 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:30:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org (InterJet.elischer.org [192.168.1.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA48845; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 12:18:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 12:18:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Kenneth Wayne Culver Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: more on latency In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG that shouldn't take TOO long.. It's possible however that it takes a while to be scheduled. you might try puting natd in the real-time scheduling queue. On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote: > I think I found the reason that my FreeBSD box is performing so poorly as > a NATing router. When I do an ipnat -l to see what "active > connections" are there on the router, a list about 3 pages long (using > ipnat -l | more) appears. I think maybe it's having trouble because for > every packet coming in and out of the router, it's got to look at that > list of active connections for the right one to send to and from. Is there > any way to make connections that aren't being used go away from the NAT > faster? Thanks a lot. > > Kenneth Culver > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message