Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 13:51:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@misha.cisco.com> To: peter@netplex.com.au (Peter Wemm) Cc: current@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: solid NFS patch #6 avail for -current - need testers files) Message-ID: <199904211751.NAA31922@misha.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <19990421174502.ECEC61F2A@spinner.netplex.com.au> from Peter Wemm at "Apr 22, 1999 01:45:01 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Wemm once wrote: > > Great work guys! It almost seems that -current is more stable than > > -stable! > Funny you should mention it. I've heard this from a number of people > over the last week.. One has even suggested using a particular > known-good 4.0 snapshot in preference to a 3.1-stable for a production > system...... Speaking of, when can we expect to see this wonderfull _stability_ improvement in -stable? I'm setting up a server here, and would rather have fixed NFS code in it... Yet, jumping to -current is officially wrong... Thanks! -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904211751.NAA31922>