From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 8 21:33:43 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A249F16A4F2 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 21:33:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QB=b5bfa1d4@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7551A13C4BD for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 21:33:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QB=b5bfa1d4@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B811316448D for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 16:12:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06028D0A89 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 16:11:30 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 21:10:56 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071108211056.45fa8ad8@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <200711081448.48390.mario.lobo@ipad.com.br> References: <200711081455.39635.cesar@expresso.com.br> <200711081448.48390.mario.lobo@ipad.com.br> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: About Freebsd 7.0 versus 6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:33:43 -0000 On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 14:48:47 -0300 Mario Lobo wrote: > On Thursday 08 November 2007, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > > 7.X is the beginning of the versions specifically designed with > > multiprocessing/cores in mind > > Does this mean that 6.x will perform better on single cpu systems? > The idea that 7.x was "specifically designed with multiprocessing/cores in mind" and that it's just an afterthought in 6.x is really wrong. It's all part of a development process that started with 5-current; most of the changes are in 6.x, they just don't work as well as they do in 7.x