From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jun 1 23: 8: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from kalaid.f2f.com.ua (kalaid.f2f.com.ua [62.149.0.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACBB237B424 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 23:08:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sobomax@mail-in.net) Received: from mail.uic-in.net (root@[212.35.189.4]) by kalaid.f2f.com.ua (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5269aB04826; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 09:09:37 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@mail-in.net) Received: from notebook.vega.com (das0-l15.uic-in.net [212.35.189.142]) by mail.uic-in.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f52680o49768; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 09:08:02 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@mail-in.net) Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 09:08:02 +0300 (EEST) Message-Id: <200106020608.f52680o49768@mail.uic-in.net> To: mwm@mired.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org From: Maxim Sobolev Reply-To: sobomax@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: WITHOUT_X vs. WITHOUT_X11 vs. NO_X X-Mailer: Pygmy (v0.5.8) In-Reply-To: <15127.62143.888966.869172@guru.mired.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 1 Jun 2001 14:53:35 -0500, Mike Meyer wrote: > Maxim Sobolev types: > > Mike Meyer wrote: > > > Since WITHOUT_X has already been documented, fixing the ports that > > > used one of the other variables to use that one relatively soon would > > > be a good thing. Unless there's a good reason to use one of the other > > > two, that is. > > I'm voting for WITHOUT_X11 - it is unlikely that we will see X12 in a foreseable > > future, so why to bother? > > If we never see X12, there's no reason to use either one. On the off > chance that we do, we'll have problems. Why ask for trouble? If we ever see X12, it will unlikely to be compatible with X11 anyway, so we will need WITHOUT_X12 etc. At the same time, we have X11BASE, so little consistency certainly won't hurt. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message