From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 17 20:21:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE0716A4CE; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:21:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from bast.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [66.11.174.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771E543D1D; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:21:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from wocker (wocker.unixathome.org [192.168.0.99]) by bast.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BBF3D28; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 23:21:47 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Langille" To: Kris Kennaway Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 23:21:47 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4032A20B.20562.40C1DBF1@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <200402180355.i1I3txiV048038@repoman.freebsd.org> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mbone/rqm Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 04:21:48 -0000 On 17 Feb 2004 at 19:55, Kris Kennaway wrote: > kris 2004/02/17 19:55:59 PST > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > mbone/rqm Makefile > Log: > Remove BROKEN tag; this now compiles on 5.x. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.6 +0 -6 ports/mbone/rqm/Makefile FreshPorts is seeing this, not sure why yet: [dan@nezlok:/usr/home/dan/ports/mbone/rqm] $ make -V PORTNAME "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1693: Malformed conditional (${XFREE86_VERSION} == 3) "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1693: Need an operator "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1753: Malformed conditional (exists(/usr/bin/perl5) && ${OSVERSION} >= 300000 && ${OSVERSION} < 5 00036) etc.... A quick test of another port doesn't raise that issue. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ BSDCan - http://www.bsdcan.org/