From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 13 18:01:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380A41065675 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:01:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alc@cs.rice.edu) Received: from mail.cs.rice.edu (mail.cs.rice.edu [128.42.1.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1123B8FC1C for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:01:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alc@cs.rice.edu) Received: from mail.cs.rice.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1282C2ACE; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:01:33 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavis-2.4.0 at mail.cs.rice.edu Received: from mail.cs.rice.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.rice.edu (mail.cs.rice.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id vVnSlrSuBZ9r; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:01:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: from adsl-216-63-78-18.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net (adsl-216-63-78-18.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net [216.63.78.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC472C2A63; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:01:25 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <49E37DF4.5010301@cs.rice.edu> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:01:24 -0500 From: Alan Cox User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090404) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garrett Cooper References: <49E11CE7.5050903@cs.rice.edu> <49E172A3.2000108@samsco.org> <49E174DE.90603@cs.rice.edu> <7d6fde3d0904121506u5ed82765oe6fd73231f4c6b97@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7d6fde3d0904121506u5ed82765oe6fd73231f4c6b97@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: svn commit: r190949 - head/sys/vm] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:01:34 -0000 Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Alan Cox wrote: > >> Scott Long wrote: >> >>> Off the top of my head, I would almost expect this to conflict with >>> Java. Haven't tried it, though, so I can't do anything more than >>> speculate. However, I would encourage testing here. >>> >>> >> It doesn't. I verified that the Sun JVM works. >> > > Has this been verified with Perl / Python yet? > -Garrett > Python, yes. In general, I wouldn't worry about any language implementation that doesn't include a JIT compiler. Alan