Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 18:00:26 +0900 From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@mahoroba.org> To: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> Cc: Yarema <yds@CoolRat.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@mahoroba.org> Subject: Re: IPv6 for ports, automaticly enable it or not? Message-ID: <yge3d0wi0np.wl@piano.mahoroba.org> In-Reply-To: <20020124161554.G825@k7.mavetju.org> References: <20020123163021.A97184@k7.mavetju.org> <980340000.1011786243@volyn.coolrat.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 16:15:54 +1100
>>>>> Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> said:
edwin> Maybe there can come a standard entry in /etc/make.conf then, which
edwin> implies that IPv6 support is required: WITH_IPV6 for example. In
edwin> that way ports which support IPV6 have a single switch to look at
edwin> to enable IPv6.
edwin> No WITH_IPV6, do not compile in IPv6 support in the application.
edwin> WITH_IPV6, do compile in IPv6 into the application.
edwin> It sound logical and easy enough to do it this way, doesn't it?
We need package. In such case, IPv6 version of package is not made.
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@mahoroba.org ume@bisd.hitachi.co.jp ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?yge3d0wi0np.wl>