From nobody Sat Aug 10 15:56:33 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Wh54Y3Y98z5SR7N for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 15:56:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net [65.75.216.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Wh54X0csjz4SCC; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 15:56:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gndrsh.dnsmgr.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net designates 65.75.216.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id 47AFuXx5065670; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 08:56:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id 47AFuXJm065669; Sat, 10 Aug 2024 08:56:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <202408101556.47AFuXJm065669@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: A Demo of rust-in-base In-Reply-To: <202408041904.474J4b9e050871@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 08:56:33 -0700 (PDT) CC: Alan Somers , FreeBSD Hackers X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] List-Id: Technical discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hackers List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.79 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.993]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gndrsh.dnsmgr.net,none]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:65.75.216.0/23]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:10494, ipnet:65.75.216.0/23, country:US]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Wh54X0csjz4SCC > -------- > Alan Somers writes: > > On Sun, Aug 4, 2024 at 12:20=E2=80=AFPM Poul-Henning Kamp > dk> wrote: > > > > How is that different from any other dependency management in ports ? > > > > Because those two components need to be updated in lock-step with > > potentially any git commit to the base system. Not just official > > releases, even minor ones. > > I'm not trying to be glib here: I really want to make sure I understand > any fine nuances you are trying to communicate. > > Isn't that precisely what drm-kmod already deals with ? That may be a bad sample, as IIRC, that code is moving back into base because it was found to be "too much of a headache" to maintain externally as a port. Or at least I recall such a discussion occuring. > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org