From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 19 19:33:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D22106566B; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 19:33:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juli@clockworksquid.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E3A8FC0A; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 19:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk35 with SMTP id 35so342362qyk.13 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 11:33:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.95.19 with SMTP id b19mr1567153qcn.179.1298144034307; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 11:33:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: juli@clockworksquid.com Received: by 10.229.74.70 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 11:33:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201102191929.11510.brucec@freebsd.org> References: <201102131818.p1DIIuLL046962@svn.freebsd.org> <201102191929.11510.brucec@freebsd.org> From: Juli Mallett Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 11:33:34 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: E8gBXoANcoq-NLLunCFE7vXosX0 Message-ID: To: Bruce Cran Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r218650 - head/games/fortune/datfiles X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 19:33:55 -0000 On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 11:29, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Saturday 19 February 2011 17:25:32 Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: > >> Did anybody complain about this? If not, would you mid either revert >> this commit or just go ahead and move all "potentially" offensive >> jokes to fortunes-o? Anything from Grouch Marx or Mark Twain will >> probably qualify. > > Yes, someone complained. From =A0bin/137702: > > "A coworker pointed out a borderline offensive fortune that appeared in m= y > email signature which is partially generated from `fortune -s` output. > > [...] > > I agree that it's probably not appropriate in a professional setting." Professionally-appropriate is not the same as offensive, and such standards vary considerably more than ones for offensiveness. I don't think professionally-appropriate is the right standard for fortune. Certainly there's not really anything very professional about having a random E-Mail signature that's meant to amuse, for that matter.