From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Jun 29 02:23:34 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA08596
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 29 Jun 1998 02:23:34 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA08588
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jun 1998 02:23:27 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA02524;
	Mon, 29 Jun 1998 02:22:42 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
To: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>
cc: Thomas Dean <tomdean@ix.netcom.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Draft manpages available for review 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 29 Jun 1998 09:16:02 BST."
             <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980629091055.1385I-100000@herring.nlsystems.com> 
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 02:22:42 -0700
Message-ID: <2520.899112162@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Do we have any convention in our manpages for which dialect of English
> spelling to use?

I don't think trying to force a mandate either way would be prudent.
Powers far greater than we in the linguistics community have already
failed at this task. :)

- Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message