From owner-freebsd-current Fri Feb 28 9:17:55 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C10337B405; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:17:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from centaur.acm.jhu.edu (centaur.acm.jhu.edu [128.220.223.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2938B43FAF; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:17:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jflemer@acm.jhu.edu) Received: by centaur.acm.jhu.edu (Postfix, from userid 556) id E62A913E99; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 12:17:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by centaur.acm.jhu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E572237E8E; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 12:17:51 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 12:17:51 -0500 (EST) From: "James E. Flemer" Reply-To: "James E. Flemer" To: Cc: Subject: FAST_IPSEC and INET6 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The commit message for src/sys/netipsec/ipsec.c r1.1 mentions that FAST_IPSEC and INET6 should not be used together. As far as I can tell from the commit log, nothing has changed that would negate that recommendation since the import. However, when compiling a -current (as of today) kernel with FAST_IPSEC and without INET6, there is some breakage (with -Werror). The prototype and definition of ipsec6_setspidx_in6pcb() are within #ifdef INET6 blocks (line 187 & 491), but the function is used on line 292, regardless of INET6. I'm not familiar enough with this code to offer up a patch. -James To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message