From owner-freebsd-security Wed Oct 13 11:19:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from bsdie.rwsystems.net (bsdie.rwsystems.net [209.197.223.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB65A152D3 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 1999 11:19:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jwyatt@rwsystems.net) Received: from bsdie.rwsystems.net([209.197.223.2]) (1281 bytes) by bsdie.rwsystems.net via sendmail with P:esmtp/R:bind_hosts/T:inet_zone_bind_smtp (sender: ) id for ; Wed, 13 Oct 1999 13:14:02 -0500 (CDT) (Smail-3.2.0.106 1999-Mar-31 #1 built 1999-Aug-7) Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 13:14:01 -0500 (CDT) From: James Wyatt To: Greg Lewis Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeSSH In-Reply-To: <199910130258.MAA62519@ares.maths.adelaide.edu.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 13 Oct 1999, Greg Lewis wrote: > In the interests of minimising bloat we could balance its inclusion by > deleting something like, say, uucp. > (:-) for the uucps users) As another heavy UUCP user on several machine here (and owner of CD sets for 2.26/2.28/3.2/3.3/etc...) I wouldn't mind a wel-done package if it still used /etc/uucp and added the UUCP user. I also would not mind it being another optinal binset on the install. I have been saving a fair amount of room on my hosts by removing the yp executables we *never* want and the 3MB+ of Japanese manpages we can't read. I'm sure there are more examples of 'things that could be default unchecked boxes in the install' things. - Jy@ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message