From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 15:15:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 680DF1065670; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:15:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3406D8FC16; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:15:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.101]) by mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C902AFC1C6; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:15:26 -0900 (AKST) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:15:24 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <49235108.2030907@mykitchentable.net> <4924260F.9040708@mykitchentable.net> <200811191605.33939.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <200811191605.33939.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200811191615.25269.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Drew Tomlinson , Jeremy Chadwick , Polytropon Subject: Re: FBSD 7.1 & kern.maxdsiz X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:15:27 -0000 On Wednesday 19 November 2008 16:05:33 Mel wrote: > On Wednesday 19 November 2008 15:43:27 Drew Tomlinson wrote: > > Thanks for the explanation! As pointed out by Pieter de Goeje, the > > default size in FBSD 7 amd 64 is 32 GB, confirmed with the limits > > command above. Thus datasize does not appear to be my problem. I'm > > shooting in the dark here as Urchin software support is non-existent. > > Are there any other tuneables related to datasize that I might try > > increasing? > > If the soft limit is set to 'unlimitied' for the user running the program, > then it is not a datasize problem. You may simply be out of memory. Can you > track using top(1) how far the software gets and what the memory usage is > at around the time it crashes? But of course, if this binary runs in 32-bit mode, this applies: compat.ia32.maxdsiz: 536870912 -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part.