From owner-freebsd-isp  Fri Jul 10 14:59:43 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA25074
          for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 10 Jul 1998 14:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from bastuba.partitur.se (bastuba.partitur.se [193.219.246.194])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA24969
          for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 1998 14:59:06 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se)
Received: from solist. (solist.partitur.se [193.219.246.204])
	by bastuba.partitur.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id XAA10909;
	Fri, 10 Jul 1998 23:59:01 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from girgen@partitur.se)
Received: from partitur.se by solist. (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id XAA04667; Fri, 10 Jul 1998 23:57:28 +0200
Message-ID: <35A68E48.BD4B924A@partitur.se>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 23:57:28 +0200
From: Palle Girgensohn <girgen@partitur.se>
Organization: Partitur
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.6 sun4u)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Glen Foster <gfoster@gfoster.com>
CC: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Help: bridge router trouble
References: <199807102131.RAA11918@gfoster.intr.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Glen,

Thanks for your reply. I'll get back to my ISP on monday.

BTW, did I mentione that my ISP could ping me if I set up a client
machine (a mac, in fact) directly on the cisco with IP x.y.q.46. But he
couldn't ping me when the freebsd machine was there instead, even if I
shut off ip forwarding in the kernel (w/ sysctl) and shut off the
internal interface (sort of simulating a client)?

Odd... 

I'm _not_ using a private address space, btw.

(I have set up the machine to route a private net with natd now, just to
test that it works. seems to be just fine; it routes my 192.168.0.2 
powerbook and an old fbsd workstation out to the internet and back,
which also leads me to believe that my isp made a mistake... a static
route seems like the way to go).

Thanks!

/Palle

Glen Foster wrote:
> 
> It sounds like A is missing a route to C (through B).  Either have
> your ISP configure a static route on A or run a routing protocol
> between A & B (RIP/routed is fine).  Just running routed on B isn't
> enough unless A knows to listen to it.
> 
> If A is a Cisco
> 
> Cisco> show ip route x.y.z.193
> 
> should return
> 
> x.y.q.46
> 
> If you cannot get your ISP to configure a static route on the Cisco
> (e.g. if you are using private address space for C), you will have to
> do NAT to make your C addresses appear to be x.y.q.46 to the outside
> world.
> 
> Good luck,
> Glen Foster <gfoster@gfoster.com>
> 
> >Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 20:07:55 +0200
> >From: Palle Girgensohn <girgen@partitur.se>
> >Organization: Partitur
> >

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message