From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Jul 26 23:56:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ywing.creative.net.au (ywing.creative.net.au [203.56.168.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF9237BA43 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 23:56:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from adrian@ywing.creative.net.au) Received: (from adrian@localhost) by ywing.creative.net.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA73017; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:04:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from adrian) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:03:59 +0200 From: Adrian Chadd To: John Polstra Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How much security should ldconfig enforce? Message-ID: <20000727090359.A71137@ywing.creative.net.au> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from jdp@polstra.com on Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 07:36:13PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jul 26, 2000, John Polstra wrote: > I am building a bike shed, and I was wondering if you could advise > me about what color it should be. :-) [snip] > 3. It could default to strictly secure but accept a command-line > option to relax the constraints. And an rc.conf knob could be added > to control whether or not it was strict at boot time. > > What do you folks think about this? Hrm. If you change the default behaviour, POLA might kick in. Not that I mind. I agree with the above changes, with or without POLA considerations. Adrian -- Adrian Chadd Now 17-year-olds can't play a _video game_ because its called violent - and real violence is still called dinner. -- jamie@mccarthy.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message