From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 20 12:44:05 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38ACC16A418 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:44:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from staalebk@ifi.uio.no) Received: from smtp.bluecom.no (smtp.bluecom.no [193.75.75.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F8713C48E for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:44:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from staalebk@ifi.uio.no) Received: from eschew.pusen.org (unknown [193.69.145.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.bluecom.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F84016F94D; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:24:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from chiller by eschew.pusen.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1IBrXH-0007zT-Jl; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:24:43 +0200 Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:24:43 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=E5le?= Kristoffersen To: Vince Message-ID: <20070720122443.GA29372@eschew.pusen.org> References: <20070716190441.GA19282@eschew.pusen.org> <20070716213425.GB19282@eschew.pusen.org> <20070718041159.GC37935@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20070718044700.GE37935@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20070718124350.GA25799@eschew.pusen.org> <46A06D8D.1070604@unsane.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <46A06D8D.1070604@unsane.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:53:43 +0000 Cc: current@freebsd.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=E5le?= Kristoffersen Subject: Re: Slow networkperformance in current? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:44:05 -0000 On 2007-07-20 at 09:08, Vince wrote: > Silly as it might seem when did you last recompile the iperf port? I was > about to post a me too post yesterday, until I updated my system to use > the latest sched_ule at which point iperf froze my system completely, > recompiling the port fixed the freeze and the <100Mbit/sec on localhost. > I think it was compiled against the wrong threading library (been a > while since i last recompiled it.) Actually I just spotted this myself, when I recompiled I got in the range of 600Mbits/sec to localhost. However I do noot see the increase you see when running it multiple times. I still think 600Mbits/sec is a bit low. If I run it to a remote host I see the same numbers (around 600Mbits/sec) -- Ståle Kristoffersen staalebk@ifi.uio.no