From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 17:23:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E98D16A4CE; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:23:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out009.verizon.net (out009pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170B143D5C; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:23:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([68.161.120.54]) by out009.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20040725172344.BQLR23440.out009.verizon.net@[192.168.1.3]>; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:23:44 -0500 Message-ID: <4103EC99.5040104@mac.com> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:23:37 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Dickey References: <20040725104510.GA10921@saltmine.radix.net> <20040725150847.GA19015@saltmine.radix.net> In-Reply-To: <20040725150847.GA19015@saltmine.radix.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out009.verizon.net from [68.161.120.54] at Sun, 25 Jul 2004 12:23:44 -0500 cc: x11@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: blue term color in xorg (was: Re: HEADSUP: X.Org conversion) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:23:45 -0000 Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 11:04:51AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: [ ... ] >> If the default color scheme was purposely changed, would not an >> easier answer had simply been "the default color scheme has >> changed; use Xdefaults to tailor"? > > that would have been an oversimplification. Ah, I see. X11 is still being developed by people who either cannot manage to answer a simple question with a simple answer, or choose not to. -- -Chuck