From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 25 21:26:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2109C16A4CE for ; Tue, 25 May 2004 21:26:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakermmtao09.cox.net (lakermmtao09.cox.net [68.230.240.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9721843D1F for ; Tue, 25 May 2004 21:26:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.140]) by lakermmtao09.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040526042614.HYTB23950.lakermmtao09.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>; Wed, 26 May 2004 00:26:14 -0400 To: Joe Marcus Clarke References: <1085272176.25372.18.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Message-ID: From: Jeremy Messenger Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 23:27:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1085272176.25372.18.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> User-Agent: Opera7.23/Linux M2 build 518 cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: databases/mergeant crashed, here's backtraces.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 04:26:31 -0000 On Sat, 22 May 2004 20:29:37 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 01:23, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> Hello, >> >> It's my first time to play with it. It will crash on some of tables for >> unknown reason when you double click on it. Attaching the backtraces, so >> let me know if I should report to their bugzilla or whatever. If anyone >> has the tinderbox installed, then you can setup mergeant and double >> click >> on jails table to get it crashes. It doesn't crash on ports, builds and >> other tables. Possible it has to do with some characters or something >> different that mergeant doesn't like it. > > libgnomedb and libgda2 are _VERY_ buggy right now in their own right. I > don't know how they released 1.0.4. It just plain didn't work. I sent > them a patch, but it looks like all the active development is going into > 1.1.x (to become 1.2), and mergeant 0.12 is just plain ancient. > > This crash is very reproduceable. Are you looking into this? I didn't know that they are very buggy. As you said that the very active developement is on 1.2 rather than 1.0.x, then I think we can wait for this. I might take the look and I can't make any promise. Cheers, Mezz > Joe > >> >> Cheers, >> Mezz -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.