From owner-freebsd-java Sat Oct 2 12:55:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (ns.mt.sri.com [206.127.79.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D324214C59 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 12:55:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA02468; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 13:55:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id NAA08219; Sat, 2 Oct 1999 13:55:34 -0600 Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 13:55:34 -0600 Message-Id: <199910021955.NAA08219@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jose Marques Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Announce: New release of JDK1.1.8 for FreeBSD In-Reply-To: References: <199909230514.XAA18035@mt.sri.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [ I just thought of something, sorry I didn't mention it in my previous email ] > > - Updated to now use the assembly version of the interpreter. Performance > > should be increased slightly. > > I performed a very informal performance test using the VolcanoMark > benchmark. Again, thanks for doing this. However, I have a small favor to ask. Can you *also* try running the benchmark using the newest TYA JIT (1.5), and see what performance changes it does. I'd be interested in seeing how well it speeds up with the 9-22 JDK over the stock version. If it's a hassle, don't worry about it, but if you've still got the environment setup.... Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message