From owner-freebsd-current Mon Apr 8 5:49:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F112937B404; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 05:49:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 06A735309; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 14:49:04 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Ruslan Ermilov Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_unix pam_unix.c References: <200204072043.g37KhRi76699@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020408101138.GA68318@sunbay.com> <20020408110123.GB68318@sunbay.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 08 Apr 2002 14:49:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20020408110123.GB68318@sunbay.com> Message-ID: Lines: 25 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ruslan Ermilov writes: > You're right. I forgot to relink pam_ssh.so library, and the diff was > against the wrong revision. I will still commit the "const poisoning" > patch to libutil, as the impact turned out to be really low. Thanks, const poisoning is a Good Thing [tm]. BTW, could you try to figure out a way we can split up the libpam build so the modules can depend on libpam.so? What I'd like is: 1) build static modules 2) build static and dynamic libpam 3) build dynamic modules (with dependency on libpam.so) or 1) build dynamic libpam 2) build modules (with dependency on libpam.so) 3) build static libpam or something similar. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message