From owner-freebsd-chat  Thu Dec 11 22:47:20 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA24507
          for chat-outgoing; Thu, 11 Dec 1997 22:47:20 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA24499
          for <chat@freebsd.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 1997 22:47:11 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1])
          by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA03608
          for <chat@freebsd.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 1997 22:47:02 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com)
Message-Id: <199712120647.WAA03608@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96
To: chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: FreeBSD vs linux
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 22:47:01 -0800
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

It is interesting the on-going debate on comp.bsd.freebsd.misc.

I see this pattern over and over:

"Oh, Yeah --- just tell me whats so great about FreeBSD"
"I think that FreeBSD is a piece of shit "

My point is that the I don't see the linux camps providing much
technological arguments . What they are doing is a rather crude
system analysis.

So pretty please try not to make your opposition stronger!!

	Amancio