From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jun 25 20:18:01 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C16106564A;
	Sat, 25 Jun 2011 20:18:01 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from 65-241-43-4.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D518814E294;
	Sat, 25 Jun 2011 20:17:59 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4E064277.7070601@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 13:17:59 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201106231511.p5NFBIaG008249@repoman.freebsd.org>	<20110624005048.GA12150@FreeBSD.org>
	<20110625085724.785ebf76@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110625085724.785ebf76@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>,
	Florian Smeets <flo@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/squid Makefile ports/www/squid30 Makefile
 ports/www/squid31 Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 20:18:01 -0000

On 06/24/2011 22:57, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> Yes, but usually you don't want to spend time building something you
> wouldn't be able to use.

Unless you were building it on a system specifically designed to build 
packages to be used elsewhere, which is the traditional reasoning for 
separating BUILD_DEPENDS and RUN_DEPENDS.


Doug

-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/