From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 30 18:35:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B02D1065670 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:35:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from varga.michal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pv0-f182.google.com (mail-pv0-f182.google.com [74.125.83.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74078FC14 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:35:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pvg11 with SMTP id 11so2702199pvg.13 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:35:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=eYKfYn3VDv5AYbQOIn+8vvEwDnH3PqLHjfoV55pyMhY=; b=RNDfUwVDMS21V1wSm9AXJdcseFGVUeLqZ0V4etFMVhJBHbCyS39e2zPUM5c2fLWRFg QLEFZi/Chgdvx5WZFcfw8bhSIxT1akJhUGSROpj148JP4FLWPfuj0qYi0UZmAG2AEiu3 a1TH8ch7nOX8Kdxvn+VULREtzXYJrLEC0cqy0= Received: by 10.142.5.35 with SMTP id 35mr1029366wfe.376.1309458917250; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:35:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.14.21 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:34:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E0CBBBD.9090704@comcast.net> References: <20110623221305.43b74d53@davenulle.org> <4E0AEA54.1080806@bally-wulff.de> <4E0C016E.1040909@comcast.net> <201106300523.41240.akirchhoff135014@gmail.com> <4E0C5142.2020903@comcast.net> <20110630132455.13304880@mr12941> <4E0CBBBD.9090704@comcast.net> From: Michal Varga Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:34:57 +0200 Message-ID: To: Adam K Kirchhoff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Graphic card that works? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:35:18 -0000 On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 20:09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: > I love how you say you're not going into an ATI flameware again, and then > you spend the entire paragraph trying to start one. > > Adam In which i single-handedly succeeded, even without trying, if that is the only part of my email that forced you to fire up a reply. But you're clearly not an ATI fanboy, aren't you. m. (Also, I'm not going to reply to any other provocation, so we may as much as end it right here, if that's okay with you.)