From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Sep 11 15:16:50 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id PAA08242
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 11 Sep 1995 15:16:50 -0700
Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (sri.MT.net [204.94.231.129])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA08230
          for <current@freefall.freebsd.org>; Mon, 11 Sep 1995 15:16:47 -0700
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id QAA03703; Mon, 11 Sep 1995 16:18:54 -0600
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 16:18:54 -0600
From: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199509112218.QAA03703@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Cc: current@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: libforms - thumbs up or down?
In-Reply-To: <9156.810856836@time.cdrom.com>
References: <9156.810856836@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Jordan K. Hubbard writes:
> This makes me wonder if we shouldn't just remove libforms entirely
> since _nothing_ currently uses it.

I argued for it's demise a long time ago, but Paul defended it's
existance as something that was asked for and would be used.  I still
don't see a use for it *in the tree*, though I suppose one could use it.

I consider it: ' bloat unused by any sort of application or client
....', which means it's useless since no application or client IN the
tree uses it.


Nate