From owner-freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 13 17:20:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-afs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3BD1065672 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:20:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rick@kiwi-computer.com) Received: from kiwi-computer.com (keira.kiwi-computer.com [63.224.10.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 588D58FC24 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:20:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rick@kiwi-computer.com) Received: (qmail 96832 invoked by uid 2001); 13 Dec 2008 17:20:19 -0000 Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:20:19 -0600 From: "Rick C. Petty" To: Boris Samorodov Message-ID: <20081213172019.GA96721@keira.kiwi-computer.com> References: <57098597@bb.ipt.ru> <26695644@bb.ipt.ru> <20081213004251.GA88954@keira.kiwi-computer.com> <42451957-717C-4CA3-97D9-E2ACABE55E34@pingpong.net> <60600083@bb.ipt.ru> <46367482@bb.ipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46367482@bb.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Tony Jago , Alec Kloss , "" , "Jason C. Wells" Subject: Re: OpenAFS port X-BeenThere: freebsd-afs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rick-freebsd2008@kiwi-computer.com List-Id: The Andrew File System and FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:20:21 -0000 On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 06:17:25PM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > > Personally I thinks that is overly complicated. Installing a few > > binaries that I don't use is not a big deal. Having three ports for a > > server+client system is confusing, especially since it is not very > > common practice. I'd vote for one single port, with rc switches to > > activate the different parts. > > Anyway we can't create packages since kernel sources and objs are > needed. Then really it's worth having only one port. The default > net/openafs installs both server and client. While OPENAFS_SERVER_ONLY > and OPENAFS_CLIENT_ONLY do what they should. I like the single-port idea the best, and use the OPENAFS_*_ONLY variables to disable one half. I agree with others that three ports is unnecessarily complicated. Unless there's really a technical reason to separate ports that can't be worked around, I vote: one port. Thank you for your efforts! -- Rick C. Petty