From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 18 09:35:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5884016A4CE for ; Wed, 18 May 2005 09:35:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.fujixerox.co.jp (mx2.fujixerox.co.jp [192.26.96.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546E843D8C for ; Wed, 18 May 2005 09:35:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com) Received: from isvw2.fujixerox.co.jp ([129.249.27.132]) by mx2.fujixerox.co.jp (8.11.6p2a/3.7W) with ESMTP id j4I9Zbm10778; Wed, 18 May 2005 18:35:37 +0900 (JST) Received: from ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (isvw2 [129.249.27.132]) by isvw2.fujixerox.co.jp (8.11.6p2a/3.7W) with ESMTP id j4I9ZTs20142; Wed, 18 May 2005 18:35:29 +0900 (JST) Received: from sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com ([13.198.8.73]) by ms1.fujixerox.co.jp (8.11.6p2a/3.7W) with ESMTP id j4I9ZZa07158; Wed, 18 May 2005 18:35:35 +0900 (JST) Received: from 10.198.8.10 by sgpaphq-smtp01.fujixerox.com with ESMTP id 50515451116408903; Wed, 18 May 2005 17:35:03 +0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D0FEF1DA18; Wed, 18 May 2005 17:28:23 +0800 (SGT) Received: from sess.xssc.sgp.xerox.com (unknown [13.198.33.122]) by imss.sgp.fujixerox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A591DA17; Wed, 18 May 2005 17:28:16 +0800 (SGT) From: Xu Qiang To: Giorgos Keramidas , Xu Qiang Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 17:37:44 +0800 X-Sent-Folder-Path: Sent Items X-Mailer: Oracle Connector for Outlook 9.0.4 60130 (9.0.2711) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20050518092816.94A591DA17@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> cc: Dan Nelson cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: The availability of socketbits.h? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 09:35:44 -0000 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > If you refer to the addition of a zero-filled entry at the end of the > array, it's not a fix. Just a description of what the buggy loop > seems to expect. The rest of the program works differently, so it > definitely won't work as a "fix". Even it is not a "fix", your analysis helped me a lot in solving this probl= em. Thank you! > Obviously, no. They should be hit hard on the head with a copy of > "Extreme Programming Explained" :P Haha, good idea! Regards, Xu Qiang