From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 11:05:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F92C16A4CF for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:05:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hanoi.cronyx.ru (hanoi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6284943D1D for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:05:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: (from root@localhost) by hanoi.cronyx.ru id i8MB24TE035741 for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org.checked; (8.12.8/vak/2.1) Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:02:04 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: from cronyx.ru (hi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.94]) by hanoi.cronyx.ru with ESMTP id i8MB1rhI035716; (8.12.8/vak/2.1) Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:01:53 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Message-ID: <41515C31.3030102@cronyx.ru> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:04:17 +0400 From: Roman Kurakin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nate Lawson References: <41421D6A.8070805@cronyx.ru> <414E7581.2070505@root.org> <414F256B.1030304@cronyx.ru> <200409201652.24457.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <41505663.40407@cronyx.ru> <4150607D.3020900@root.org> In-Reply-To: <4150607D.3020900@root.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: rik@FreeBSD.org cc: FreeBSD Current cc: John Baldwin Subject: Re: mp_machdep.c (was Re: [Fwd: Re: Bug reports requested - acpi]) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:05:16 -0000 Nate Lawson wrote: [...] > A quick "no" vote from me until this is really understood. I think > the real problem is an interference between the pmap for the AP trampoline > and the acpi wake code (sys/i386/acpica/acpi_wakeup.c). The address > you gave (0x9f000) is right before the base address we use for the This didn't help: static void acpi_alloc_wakeup_handler(void) { void *wakeaddr; return; ... So it looks like problem in other place. Probably some othe code affects. rik > wakeup code (0xa0000). As I woke up this morning, I was wondering if > this could be the issue. An easy way to test is to disable the call > to acpi_install_wakeup_handler() in sys/i386/acpica/acpi_machdep.c and > see if this alone fixes the problem. > > If I'm wrong, feel free to commit your patch. > > P.S. Spaces instead of tabs in your diff. > > -Nate